Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNilsson Fjällström, Emma
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-18T12:30:51Z
dc.date.available2015-03-18T12:30:51Z
dc.date.issued2015-03-18
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/38515
dc.description.abstractThis Bachelors’ thesis compares theoretical arguments for women on boards and in management with practitioners’ argumentations for women on boards. By analyzing 32 responses to the EU Commission public consultation for women on boards with argument analysis, the study assesses how theoretical models fit the debate in society. The analysis shows that the arguments go ‘outside the theoretical box’ when discussing women’s participation in the labour market. The theoretical models does not include the effect of the actors’ willingness not only to argue, but to act, in their framework on how to increase the share of women on boards. The thesis therefore concludes that the theoretical frameworks tested need to include perspectives from other areas in order to fully encompass the debate on women on boards.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEURP KANDsv
dc.relation.ispartofseries186sv
dc.subjectgendersv
dc.subjectquotassv
dc.subjectmanagementsv
dc.subjectEuropean Unionsv
dc.subjectboardsv
dc.subjectwomen on boardssv
dc.subjectdecouplingsv
dc.subjectcompetencesv
dc.subjectfamily policysv
dc.subjectgenussv
dc.subjectkvoteringsv
dc.subjectEuropeiska Unionensv
dc.subjectstyrelsesv
dc.subjectkvinnor i styrelsensv
dc.subjectdecouplingsv
dc.subjectkompetenssv
dc.subjectfamiljepolicysv
dc.titlePretty and colourful Why should there be women on European company boards?sv
dc.typeText
dc.setspec.uppsokSocialBehaviourLaw
dc.type.uppsokM2
dc.contributor.departmentGöteborgs universitet/Statsvetenskapliga institutionenswe
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Gothenburg/Department of Political Scienceeng
dc.type.degreeStudent essay


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record