Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMyrseth, Kristian Ove R.
dc.contributor.authorWollbrant, Conny E.
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-18T13:23:44Z
dc.date.available2015-03-18T13:23:44Z
dc.date.issued2015-03
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/38516
dc.descriptionJEL: D03, D64, H40sv
dc.description.abstractWe show that Rand et al. (2012) and Rand et al. (2014)—who argue that cooperation is intuitive—provide an incorrect interpretation of their own data. They make the mistake of inferring intuition from relative decision times alone, without taking into account absolute decision times. We re-examine their data and find that the vast majority of their responses are slow, exceeding four seconds, even in time-pressure treatments intended to promote intuitive responses. Further, a plot of the average cooperation rates by decision time presents no clear relationship between decision time and cooperation. However, among the few decisions that were relatively fast (less than four seconds), there appears to be a positive—not negative—correlation between decision time and cooperation. We conclude that the data presented by Rand et al. (2012) and Rand et al. (2014) fail to provide evidence for the hypothesis that cooperation is intuitive. If anything, their data indicate the opposite.sv
dc.format.extent12sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economicssv
dc.relation.ispartofseries617sv
dc.subjectCooperationsv
dc.subjectIntuitionsv
dc.subjectDecision timessv
dc.subjectPro-social behaviorsv
dc.titleIntuitive cooperation refuted: Commentary on Rand et al. (2012) and Rand et al. (2014)sv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.svepreportsv
dc.contributor.organizationDept. of Economics, University of Gothenburgsv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record