| dc.contributor.author | Vettenranta, Soilikki | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-06-18T08:33:48Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-06-18T08:33:48Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-05 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 35 Nordicom Review 36 (2015) 1, pp. 51-64 | sv |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-91-87957-10-9 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1403-1108 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/39370 | |
| dc.description.abstract | How can the authorities communicate adequately to the public after national catastrophes and deal with the distress and basic needs of citizens in an appropriate manner?
How should they address citizens after a devastating disaster that has never occurred in
the country before? The present article analyses crisis communication after two severe
catastrophes that caused great distress in the Norwegian population: the Chernobyl
power plant disaster in 1986 and the terrorist attacks on the government complex and
the Norwegian Labour Party youth camp on the island of Utøya on 22 July, 2011. The
focus will be on the communication during the initial phase of these two catastrophes,
the early days of the atrocities | sv |
| dc.format.extent | §14 p. | sv |
| dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
| dc.publisher | Nordic Council of Ministers, Nordicom | sv |
| dc.subject | rationality of caring | sv |
| dc.subject | instrumental rationalit | sv |
| dc.subject | ontological security | sv |
| dc.subject | phenomenology | sv |
| dc.subject | existential | sv |
| dc.subject | Heidegger | sv |
| dc.subject | crisis communication | sv |
| dc.title | Crisis communication and the Norwegian authorities | sv |
| dc.title.alternative | 22 July and the Chernobyl disaster: two catastrophes, dissimilar outcomes | sv |
| dc.type | Text | sv |
| dc.type.svep | article, peer reviewed scientific | sv |
| dc.contributor.organization | Nordicom | sv |
