dc.contributor.author | Brättemark, Carl | |
dc.contributor.author | Stuchly, Carl | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-07-07T13:27:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-07-07T13:27:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-07-07 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/39830 | |
dc.description.abstract | New rules for bank capital adequacy were introduced in 2013. This caused a change
in funding of real estate companies. The bank could not cover as much of the
companies funding’s as before and they had to explore other funding opportunities,
such as bonds. Bond funding in Swedish real estate companies regularly consists of
unsecured corporate bonds and the secured ones are not that common. In order to
cover the gap created by the bank funded parts of the companies’ capital; issuances of
secured corporate bonds have to increase. Drawing from the aforementioned, this
study has investigated the underlying reasons to why the secured bonds not are issued
to a greater extent.
The intent of the study is to increase the knowledge of how real estate companies
consider whether to use unsecured or secured bonds. Further, the study is based on a
deductive approach where existing theory is compared to the collected empirical
facts, this to reach a conclusion. A qualitative approach has been used to create a
detailed and narrow perspective of the problem formulation. Previous research has
been conducted within the field of study but can only be related to the actual pricing
of covered bonds, while this study presents the underlying reasons to why the
attention for the product is low. Delimitations have been made to center the study
around listed real estate companies with partly bond funding structures. The
theoretical framework describes the theories applied to analyze the empirical facts.
Our empirical evidence shows that real estate companies opt for unsecured
over secured bonds. The Swedish corporate bond market is not considered to
be sufficiently developed due to the great tradition of bank funding. The respondents
indicate that it is considered difficult to issue a secured bond, which inhibits growth.
Moreover, they clarify that the price disparity between the two options is too slight for
real estate companies to include an underlying collateral in the bond. Finally,
today bank funding is too good competitively priced and this is perceived as the main
reason as to why the issuing of secured bonds is so low, which also is our conclusion. | sv |
dc.language.iso | swe | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Industriell och finansiell ekonomi | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 14/15:6 | sv |
dc.subject | Real Estate Companies, Secured Bonds, UnsecuredBonds, Real Options, Classification, Information Asymmetry, Transaction Costs, Opportunity Cost | sv |
dc.title | Applicering av obligationsfinansiering i börsnoterade fastighetsbolag - En kvalitativ studie av säkerställda obligationer | sv |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.setspec.uppsok | SocialBehaviourLaw | |
dc.type.uppsok | M2 | |
dc.contributor.department | University of Gothenburg/Department of Business Administration | eng |
dc.contributor.department | Göteborgs universitet/Företagsekonomiska institutionen | swe |
dc.type.degree | Student essay | |