Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNinnes, Calum Edward
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-28T09:54:23Z
dc.date.available2015-08-28T09:54:23Z
dc.date.issued2015-08-28
dc.identifier.isbn978-91-628-9524-2 (Print)
dc.identifier.isbn978-91-628-9523-5 (PDF)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/39836
dc.description.abstractSexual selection, i.e. differential mating success due to contest competition or mate choice, has produced an amazing diversity of elaborate sexual signals across the animal kingdom, not least the dazzling colours of birds. According to classical ‘sender-precursor’ models of signal evolution, signals evolve because they convey information beneficial to receivers, such as the senders quality as a prospective mate or strength as an opponent. In contrast, ‘receiver-precursor’ models emphasize pre-existing receiver biases (e.g. sensory biases or generalization) as the primary drivers of signal evolution. Generally, models of sexually selected signal evolution have primarily been concerned with intersexual (mate choice) rather than intrasexual (agonistic or contest) signals. In particular, there has been almost no application of receiver-precursor models to the design and evolution of agonistic (threat) signals. This thesis tests agonistic colour signalling in the genus Euplectes, 17 species of African widowbirds and bishops, and explores receiver-precursor model explanations for the phylogenetically reconstructed and convergent evolution of red carotenoid-based signals from yellow ancestors. In addition to testing the generality of an agonistic signal function of the carotenoid colour signals, the primary goals were to 1) investigate a pre-existing bias for longer wavelength (‘redder’) colour hues in yellow-signalling species, 2) test the persistence of a receiver bias in species with highly exaggerated signals, and 3) test signalling theory that suggests agonistic signals must be reinforced by information content for receiver responses to persist. In a field experiment with the yellow-signalling montane marsh widowbird E. psammocromius (Paper I), red-manipulated territorial males were more likely to retain their territories, and won more boundary contests against neighbours, compared to control or down-manipulated males. This is the first time that a pre-existing receiver bias has been demonstrated for an agonistic signal. Because E. psammocromius is a relatively recently derived species, I then explored the evolutionary age of the receiver bias by testing for it in an ancestrally branching (outgroup) species, the yellow-crowned bishop E. afer (Paper II). In a captive population, I staged dyadic contests over food between control and red-manipulated males, in which red males secured more time at the feeder than did control males, indicating that the receiver bias (i.e. aversion to red) predated the evolution of red signals in Euplectes. The above experiments suggest strong generalization or ‘supernormal stimulus’ responses to red in yellow-signalling species, but will this persist in the most exaggerated red species? In a field experiment on the southern red bishop E. orix (Paper III), I found that males given supernormally red hues were more likely to obtain/retain a territory compared to control-red or down-manipulated males, suggesting that the receiver response remains generalized with respect to hue. The above results, together with the findings that down-manipulated males fared competitively worse that control males (Papers I-III), corroborates the proposed generality of an agonistic signal function on carotenoid colour signals in Euplectes. Lastly, when control E. afer males were repeatedly staged in dyadic contests against red-manipulated rivals (Paper IV), the initially large treatment effect (time at feeder) for red males quickly decreased over successive trials, suggesting that an innate aversion to the red signal attenuated when the signal was not reinforced by information content. In summary, I have provided the first evidence that a pre-existing receiver bias has likely driven the evolution and diversification of an agonistic signal, and thus demonstrated the applicability of receiver precursor models for explaining agonistic signal evolution. Additionally, I have corroborated the agonistic signal function of carotenoid colour displays in a further three species distributed across the Euplectes phylogeny, strengthening this unique model system for exploring sexual selection and sexual signal evolution. Finally, I found that receiver aversions of supernormal threat signals quickly attenuated, which suggests that the colour signals in Euplectes would not have evolved unless they were (and likely still are) reinforced by some (honest) information content; the nature of which remains to be explored.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.haspartI. Ninnes, C. E., Andersson, S. 2014. Male receiver bias for red agonistic signalling in a yellow-signalling widowbird: a field experiment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences. 281. ::doi::10.1098/rspb.2014.0971sv
dc.relation.haspartII. Ninnes, C. E., Adrion, M., Edelaar, P., Tella, J. L., Andersson, S. 2015. A receiver bias for red pre-dates the convergent evolution of red color in widowbirds and bishops. Behavioral Ecology. 26: 1212-1218. ::doi::10.1093/beheco/arv068sv
dc.relation.haspartIII. Ninnes, C. E., Webb, S. L., Andersson, S. Are red bishops red enough? On the persistence of a generalized receiver bias in Euplectes. Manuscript. Submitted.sv
dc.relation.haspartIV. Ninnes, C. E., Andersson, S. Calling the bluff? A rapidly declining effect of a manipulated agonistic signal and its implications for signal evolution. Manuscript.sv
dc.subjectsexual signallingsv
dc.subjectreceiver biassv
dc.subjectEuplectessv
dc.subjectsexual selectionsv
dc.titleColour signalling in widowbirds and bishopssv
dc.typeTextswe
dc.type.svepDoctoral thesiseng
dc.gup.mailcalum.ninnes@gmail.comsv
dc.type.degreeDoctor of Philosophysv
dc.gup.originUniversity of Gothenburg. Faculty of Sciencesv
dc.gup.departmentDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences ; Institutionen för biologi och miljövetenskapsv
dc.gup.defenceplaceFriday 18 September 2015, kl. 10.00, Föreläsningssalen, Medicinaregatan 18A, Göteborgsv
dc.gup.defencedate2015-09-18
dc.gup.dissdb-fakultetMNF


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record