dc.contributor.author | Liebel, Grischa | |
dc.contributor.author | Heldal, Rogardt | |
dc.contributor.author | Steghöfer, Jan-Philipp | |
dc.contributor.author | Chaudron, Michel R V | |
dc.contributor.editor | Staron, Miroslaw | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-10-16T11:04:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-10-16T11:04:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-10-16 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1654-4870 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/40812 | |
dc.description.abstract | It has been stated that industrial-grade modelling tools are unsuit- able for teaching modelling. In this paper, we present our experience with a university course on software modelling. In the first year of the course, we used a commercial modelling tool, in the second year the open- source alternative Papyrus. Both tools are considered to be of industrial grade and used in industry. Our quantitative analysis shows that the industrial-grade modelling tools with all their complexity did not have a negative impact on the students’ experience of modelling. This shows that industrial-grade modelling tools can be used in the classroom. We analyse why our experience differs from published accounts and conclude that the availability of a tool champion and tailored instruction mate- rial is key. From this, we derive recommendations for teacher support from tool-providers (vendors and open source), research directions for researchers and teachers, and for training efforts in the industry. | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.publisher | University of Gothenburg | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Research reports in Software Engineering and Management | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2015:01 | sv |
dc.subject | Software engineering | sv |
dc.title | Ready for Prime Time, - Yes, Industrial-Grade Modelling Tools can be Used in Education | sv |
dc.type | Text | sv |
dc.type.svep | report | sv |
dc.contributor.organization | University of Gothenburg | sv |