dc.contributor.author | Trier Damgaard, Mette | |
dc.contributor.author | Gravert, Christina | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-03-23T14:29:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-03-23T14:29:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-03 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1403-2465 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/42370 | |
dc.description | JEL: C93, D03, D64, H41 | sv |
dc.description.abstract | We document the hidden costs of one of the most policy-relevant nudges, reminders. Sending
reminders, while proven effective in facilitating behavior change, may come at a cost for both senders and receivers. Using a large scale field experiment with a charity, we find that
reminders increase donations, but they also substantially increase unsubscriptions from the
mailing list. To understand this novel finding, we develop a dynamic model of donation and
unsubscription behavior with limited attention which is tested in reduced-form using a second
field experiment. We also estimate our model structurally to perform a welfare analysis,
showing that reminders are welfare diminishing for the potential donors as non-givers incur a welfare loss of $2.35 for every reminder. The net benefit of every reminder to the charity is $0.18. Our evaluation shows the need to evaluate nudges on their intended as well as unintended consequences. | sv |
dc.format.extent | 49 | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers in Economics | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 650 | sv |
dc.subject | Avoiding-the-ask | sv |
dc.subject | charitable giving | sv |
dc.subject | field experiment | sv |
dc.subject | inattention | sv |
dc.subject | nudge | sv |
dc.subject | reminders | sv |
dc.title | The hidden costs of nudging: Experimental evidence from reminders in fundraising | sv |
dc.type | Text | sv |
dc.type.svep | report | sv |
dc.contributor.organization | Dept. of Economics, University of Gothenburg | sv |