Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWahlström, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-04T06:16:52Z
dc.date.available2016-05-04T06:16:52Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-04
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/43362
dc.description.abstractFeedback is a very broad term involving many different ways of providing information to our students. The effectiveness of feedback has been largely debated throughout history. The major debate had its starting point in Truscott´s (1996) claim that error correction is ineffective and perhaps even harmful. Many researchers objected to this thesis and started extensive research, measuring effects of different feedback types against control groups that did not receive any feedback. This literature review will report the findings from studies measuring whether direct or indirect feedback on form is effective at all and which is most effective for ESL/EFL students´ writing accuracy. Motivation seems to be a factor influencing the effects of feedback as well and therefore studies on this will be reviewed as well. In general the results seem to indicate that feedback- both direct and indirect- is effective, with a growing amount of research favoring focused feedback.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSPL kandidatuppsats engelska lärarutbildningsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSPLLÄR 2014-012sv
dc.subjectDirect feedbacksv
dc.subjectIndirect feedbacksv
dc.subjectEFLsv
dc.subjectESLsv
dc.subjectMotivationsv
dc.titleEffects of direct and indirect feedback on ESL/EFL writing. A literature review focusing on formsv
dc.typeText
dc.setspec.uppsokHumanitiesTheology
dc.type.uppsokM2
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Gothenburg/Department of Languages and Literatureseng
dc.contributor.departmentGöteborgs universitet/Institutionen för språk och litteraturerswe
dc.type.degreeStudent essay


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record