dc.contributor.author | Winroth, Hampus | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-16T09:06:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-16T09:06:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-08-16 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/45891 | |
dc.description | Uppsats för avläggande av filosofie kandidatexamen i
Kulturvård, Bebyggelseantikvariskt program
15 hp
Institutionen för kulturvård
Göteborgs universitet
2016:11 | sv |
dc.description.abstract | This essay elucidates ”municipalsamhällen”, an administrative form of agglomerations in
rural districts in Sweden, common at the turn of the 20th century. A kind of communities we
know little about today. This study examines the government authorities ideals regarding
those communities, as well as the ideals of the communities themselves. It is also
investigated what built environment ”municipalsamhällen” generated and how these
environments has been handled until today. A review of the knowledge regarding
”municipalsamhällen” in the literature, research and legal acts are included. Two choosen
communities, Lilla Edet and Stenstorp have been examined through their administrative
board archives, historical maps, literature and field studies. It is found that most
”municipalsamhällen” were initialised by the county administrative board, in a fear of fire
disaster, epidemic outbreaks and to safeguard rational land utilization. When the county
forced the communities to establish ”municipalsamhällen”, the communities were already
densely built and it was hard to regulate their present buildings in a town plan. The
”municipalsamhällen” formed ad hoc-plans that mostly followed their existing disposition.
However, the town plans stipulated urban town centres with full block stone houses. Most
of these centre plans never came about, but the communities did build a lot of
infrastructure regarding water, sewerage and pavements. The examined communities also
generated different types of built environment such as; a community house, a bathhouse,
a power plant and a sports field. Though, none of these environments appeared in both of
the communities. The type of community ”municipalsamhällen” has not been highlighted
by the field of heritage authorities. This essay suggests that this could be due to the
difficulty to form typologies which describe ”municipalsamhällen” well. It is a pity as these
communities generated built environment that deserve our attention. | sv |
dc.language.iso | swe | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | ISSN 1101-3303 | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | ISRN GU/KUV—16/11--SE | sv |
dc.subject | Municipalsamhälle | sv |
dc.subject | rural agglomerations | sv |
dc.subject | Gregor Paulsson | sv |
dc.subject | Typologies | sv |
dc.subject | Railway station villages | sv |
dc.title | Municipalsamhällen i Västra Götaland Bebyggelse i Sveriges en gång vanligaste typ av tätort | sv |
dc.title.alternative | Municipalsamhällen in the County Västra Götaland Built environment in Swedens once most common type of community | sv |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.setspec.uppsok | PhysicsChemistryMaths | |
dc.type.uppsok | M2 | |
dc.contributor.department | University of Gothenburg/Department of Conservation | eng |
dc.contributor.department | Göteborgs universitet/Institutionen för kulturvård | swe |
dc.type.degree | Student essay | |