Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKataria, Mitesh
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-27T12:49:34Z
dc.date.available2017-02-27T12:49:34Z
dc.date.issued2017-02
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/51829
dc.descriptionJEL: C93, D01, D03sv
dc.description.abstractEvidence from ten natural field studies comparing long-distance runners' incentivized predictions of race finishing time with their actual finishing time is reported. A modest but regular bias is found. Male runners are consistently found to be more time optimistic than female runners and finish slower than they predict to finish. Males are found to over-appreciate their physical fitness. To the extent this behaviour carries over to other contexts, such as the labor market, the tendency of men to overestimate their capacity could lead to distorted self-appraisals and give them advantages in terms of higher salaries and better positions.sv
dc.format.extent44sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economicssv
dc.relation.ispartofseries694sv
dc.subjectOverconfidencesv
dc.subjectTime optimismsv
dc.subjectGender differencessv
dc.titleHow long do you think it will take? Field Evidence on Gender Differences in Time Optimismsv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.svepreportsv
dc.contributor.organizationDept. of Economics, University of Gothenburgsv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record