dc.contributor.author | Borgfeldt, Eva | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-05T18:17:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-11-05T18:17:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-11-05 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-91-7346-937-1 (print) | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-91-7346-938-8 (pdf) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0436-1121 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/53675 | |
dc.description.abstract | Drawing and coloring have been part of young students text making as long
as the writing system has been used, but with the increased use of digital tools
and an enlarged focus on accountability of today there is a reinforced
educational interest to understand what constitutes multimodal student texts
in the context of classroom practice. This thesis project overall aim is to
highlight and discuss the opportunities and difficulties in the assessment of
language and knowledge-developing multimodal text work in a multilingual
educational context.
Conceptually the study is grounded in sociocultural theories, in
sociosemiotic theory and in multiliteracies research. The methods used consist
of qualitative multimodal text analysis and semi-structured interviews with
students and their teacher.
The three empirical studies were carried out, each having a different
perspective. The first study looks at the text production of students in an
integrated work of drawing, coloring and writing. The second study focuses
how students reason when they choose to draw, write or both draw and write
when they report to their teacher what they have learned. The third study
discusses what the teacher highlights when assessing her students’ multimodal
text productions.
Overall, the results show that the semiotic resources, images and color,
dominate students’ text productions and that the teacher attaches great
importance to the illustrations, but that she, despite the best intentions, has
trouble using multimodal criteria when assessing the students’ different ways
of expressions and semiotic resources into a whole. It seems to be
problematic for the teacher to allow students to freely interpret and
independently design the task while she at the same time intends to make an
overall assessment of how the content is presented. The results also indicate
that it is difficult for the students to verbalize their thoughts on the
assessment and in practice; the teacher more often is focused on assessing
abilities relating to how thoroughly the students carry out the process of
documenting rather than encouraging the students to develop and express
their knowledge. Finally, the thesis concludes with discussing the content of
an ongoing need for research, especially regarding the consequences it may
have for younger students, whatever language background they have. | sv |
dc.language.iso | swe | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Gothenburg Studies in Educational Sciences | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 407 | sv |
dc.relation.haspart | Borgfeldt, E., & Lyngfelt, A. (2014). Elevtexter som sociosemiotiska uttryck.
En studie av elevrespons och sociosemiotisk positionering i årskurs 3.
I P. Andersson, P. Holmberg, A. Lyngfelt, A. Nordenstam, & O. Widhe
(Red.), Mångfaldens möjligheter. Litteratur- och språkdidaktik i Norden (s. 131-153).
Göteborg: Nationella nätverket för svenska med didaktisk inriktning.
https://www5.kau.se/sites/default/files/Dokument/subpage/2014/12/m_n
gfaldens_m_jligheter_20141123_pdf_57141.pdf | sv |
dc.relation.haspart | Borgfeldt, E., & Lyngfelt, A. (2017). ”Jag ritade först sen skrev jag”.
Elevperspektiv på multimodal textproduktion i årskurs 3.
Forskning om undervisning och lärande 2017: 1 vol. 5, s. 64-88.
http://www.forskul.se/tidskrift/nummer18/jag_ritade_forst_sen_skrev_jag_
__elevperspektiv_pa_multimodal_textproduktion_i_arskurs_3 | sv |
dc.relation.haspart | Borgfeldt, E. (2017). Multimodal textproduktion i årskurs 3 – analys av en
lärares bedömning.
Educare: 2017: 1, s. 118-151. Malmö: Lärande och samhälle, Malmö högskola.
https://www.mah.se/upload/FAKULTETER/LS/Dokument%20LS/Educa
re%2017.1%20muep.pdf | sv |
dc.subject | multimodality | sv |
dc.subject | semiotic resources | sv |
dc.subject | meaning making | sv |
dc.subject | literacy | sv |
dc.subject | assessment | sv |
dc.subject | multilingualism | sv |
dc.title | ”Det kan vara svårt att förklara på rader”. Perspektiv på analys och bedömning av multimodal textproduktion i årskurs 3. | sv |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.type.svep | Doctoral thesis | |
dc.gup.mail | eva.borgfeldt@hkr.se | sv |
dc.type.degree | Doctor of Philosophy | sv |
dc.gup.origin | Göteborgs universitet. Utbildningsvetenskapliga fakulteten | swe |
dc.gup.origin | University of Gothenburg. Faculty of Education | eng |
dc.gup.department | Department of Pedagogical, Curricular and Professional Studies ; Institutionen för didaktik och pedagogisk profession | sv |
dc.gup.price | 212 kr | |
dc.gup.defenceplace | Fredagen den 24 november 2017, kl. 13.00 Göteborgs universitet, Pedagogen, Hus B, sal BE 036 | sv |
dc.gup.defencedate | 2017-11-24 | |
dc.gup.dissdb-fakultet | UF | |