Visa enkel post

dc.contributor.authorAllwood, Jens
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-15T15:13:17Z
dc.date.available2018-01-15T15:13:17Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/54965
dc.descriptionProceedings of DiSS 2017, 18–19 August 2017, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm Swedensv
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I investigate the concepts of ”fluency” and ”disfluency” and argue that the application of the two concepts must be relativized to type of communicative activity. It is not clear that there is a generic sense of fluency or disfluency, rather what contributes to fluency and disfluency depends on what type of communication we are dealing with. The paper then turns to a brief investigation of what makes interactive face-to-face communication fluent or disfluent and argues that many of the features that have been labeled as disfluent, in fact, contribute to the fluency of interactive communication. Finally, I suggest that maybe it is time for a change of terminology and abandon the term “disfluent” for more positive or neutral terminology.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.titleFluency or Disfluency?sv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.sveparticle, peer reviewed scientificsv
dc.contributor.organizationSCCIIL Interdisciplinary Center, University of Gothenburgsv


Filer under denna titel

Thumbnail

Dokumentet tillhör följande samling(ar)

Visa enkel post