dc.contributor.author | Allwood, Jens | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-01-15T15:13:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-01-15T15:13:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/54965 | |
dc.description | Proceedings of DiSS 2017, 18–19 August 2017, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm Sweden | sv |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper, I investigate the concepts of ”fluency” and ”disfluency” and argue that the application of the two concepts must be relativized to type of communicative activity. It is not clear that there is a generic sense of fluency or disfluency, rather what contributes to fluency and disfluency depends on what type of communication we are dealing with.
The paper then turns to a brief investigation of
what makes interactive face-to-face communication fluent or disfluent and argues that many of the features that have been labeled as disfluent, in fact, contribute to the fluency of interactive communication. Finally, I suggest that maybe it is time for a change of terminology and abandon the term “disfluent” for more positive or neutral terminology. | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.title | Fluency or Disfluency? | sv |
dc.type | Text | sv |
dc.type.svep | article, peer reviewed scientific | sv |
dc.contributor.organization | SCCIIL Interdisciplinary Center, University of Gothenburg | sv |