• English
    • svenska
  • English 
    • English
    • svenska
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Student essays / Studentuppsatser
  • Institute of Medicine / Institutionen för medicin
  • Examensarbete 30 Hp, Läkarprogrammet
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Student essays / Studentuppsatser
  • Institute of Medicine / Institutionen för medicin
  • Examensarbete 30 Hp, Läkarprogrammet
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Lung ultrasound for detection of pulmonary edema in the critically ill

Abstract
Background For detection and monitoring of pulmonary edema and for guidance in fluid management, chest x-ray (CXR) and thermodilution technique (PiCCO®) is commonly used in the critically ill. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a cheap and easy method for detection of pulmonary pathology with increasing popularity in emergency departments and intensive care units (ICUs). LUS can be used to detect b-lines as a sign of interstitial lung fluid. Aim The primary goal of this study was to investigate if a simplified 8-zone LUS-protocol would correlate to extravascular lung water in patients with critical illness. A secondary goal was to compare LUS-accuracy in detection of pulmonary edema to chest x-ray. Method A prospective observational pilot study was conducted. Patients with a PiCCO® catheter and/or having a chest x-ray were enrolled and LUS scans performed at the central intensive care unit (CIVA) at Sahlgrenska university hospital. Following an 8-zone protocol, b-line score (BLS) was correlated to extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) obtained through transpulmonary 3 thermodilution. CXR reports were examined for signs of pulmonary edema and compared to BLS. Results 28 patients were enrolled, and 48 lung ultrasound scans performed. LUS compared to transpulmonary thermodilution showed a significant correlation between BLS and EVLWI (r=0.43, p=0.032). In patients with several measurements, there was a positive correlation between changes in BLS and changes in extravascular lung water (p=0.012). The best cut-off value for detection of pulmonary edema was a b-line score of 6. Sensitivity for detection of pulmonary edema using transpulmonary thermodilution was 78% and specificity 64% with an AUC of 0.82. The sensitivity and specificity of b-line score for detection of pulmonary edema using chest x-ray was 100% and 35%. Conclusions In this study of patients with critical illness examined with lung ultrasound, the main finding was that b-line score correlated to extravascular lung water measured with PiCCO®. Compared to chest x-ray, LUS could exclude pulmonary edema. Lung ultrasound is a simple and feasible method. It has a steep learning curve and can be used in emergency departments and intensive care units for detection and monitoring of pulmonary edema.
Degree
Student essay
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/2077/56190
Collections
  • Examensarbete 30 Hp, Läkarprogrammet
View/Open
gupea_2077_56190_1.pdf (600.9Kb)
Date
2018-04-13
Author
Olin, Max
Keywords
Lung ultrasound, point of care ultrasound, transpulmonary thermodilution, PiCCO, chest x-ray, emergency medicine, intensive care medicine
Language
eng
Metadata
Show full item record

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV