Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRosca, Oxana
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-25T15:28:50Z
dc.date.available2018-08-25T15:28:50Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-25
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/57434
dc.description.abstractAim: To examine within-country differences in the effect of school-level factors and schools’ compensatory power through directly comparing the estimated coefficients on individual- and between-school levels. Theory: Input-Process-Output (IPO) conceptual and analytical model in the rubric of educational outcomes and predictive factors of Educational Effectiveness Research Method: Two-level models with random-slope were estimated at student- and school levels using Mplus application as a statistical tool. Results: None of the variables covered by PISA 2015 in Moldova may be defined as a strong predictor of cognitive performance of Moldovan students. The context of school location is the strongest school-level factor, positively associated with increased inequity in cognitive results of Moldovan students. Equal distribution of more- and less-qualified teachers across the schools. Compensatory power of Romanian-medium-school teaching style against the inequity in students’ cultural background.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMastersv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVT18 IPS PDA184:12sv
dc.subjectEducational Equitysv
dc.subjectTwo-level Modelingsv
dc.subjectPISAsv
dc.subjectMoldovasv
dc.titleEDUCATIONAL EQUITY IN MOLDOVAN COMPULSORY SCHOOLS Factors behind Outcome Differences in PISA 2015sv
dc.typeTexteng
dc.setspec.uppsokSocialBehaviourLaw
dc.type.uppsokH2
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Gothenburg/Department of education and special educationeng
dc.contributor.departmentGöteborgs universitet/Institutionen för pedagogik och specialpedagogikswe
dc.type.degreeStudent Essayeng


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record