Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorParslow, Elle
dc.contributor.authorRanehill, Eva
dc.contributor.authorZethraeus, Niklas
dc.contributor.authorBlomberg, Liselott
dc.contributor.authorvon Schoultz, Bo
dc.contributor.authorLindén Hirschberg, Angelica
dc.contributor.authorJohannesson, Magnus
dc.contributor.authorDreber, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-11T12:21:30Z
dc.date.available2019-02-11T12:21:30Z
dc.date.issued2019-02
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/59073
dc.descriptionJEL codes: C91,D03sv
dc.description.abstractMany studies report on the association between 2D:4D, a putative marker for prenatal testosterone exposure, and economic preferences. However, most of these studies have limited sample sizes and test multiple hypotheses (without preregistration). In this study we mainly replicate the common specifications found in the literature for the association between the 2D:4D ratio and risk taking, the willingness to compete, and dictator game giving separately. In a sample of 330 women we find no robust associations between any of these economic preferences and 2D:4D. We find no evidence of an effect for sixteen of the eighteen total regressions we run. The two regression specifications which are significant have not previously been reported and the associations are not in the expected direction, and therefore they are unlikely to represent a real effect.sv
dc.format.extent22sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.publisherUniversity of Gothenburgsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economicssv
dc.relation.ispartofseries750sv
dc.subjecteconomic preferencessv
dc.subjectexperimentsv
dc.subjecttestosteronesv
dc.titleThe digit ratio (2D:4D) and economic preferences: no robust associations in a sample of 330 womensv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.svepreportsv
dc.contributor.organizationDept. of Economics, University of Gothenburgsv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record