dc.contributor.author | Helénsdotter, Ronja | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-27T11:40:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-27T11:40:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-05 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1403-2465 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/60343 | |
dc.description | JEL: C71, C90, D70, D 84 | sv |
dc.description.abstract | The main objective of this paper is to strengthen the knowledge about the relationship between cooperation and political affiliation. For this purpose, I carry out an incentivized N-person prisoner’s dilemma experiment. I find that left-wing voters cooperate more than right-wing voters in 3-person prisoner’s dilemmas. However, this difference in cooperation tapers off with group size due to a heterogeneous response to larger decision groups. While leftists cooperate less as the group size increases, I find no significant group size effect for rightists. These findings can partly be explained by differences in beliefs about the cooperativeness of others, but a substantial part remains unexplained. | sv |
dc.format.extent | 68 | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers in Economics | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 765 | sv |
dc.subject | Cooperation | sv |
dc.subject | Social dilemma | sv |
dc.subject | Political ideology | sv |
dc.subject | Group size | sv |
dc.subject | Experiment | sv |
dc.title | Experimental Evidence on Cooperation, Political Affiliation, and Group Size | sv |
dc.type | Text | sv |
dc.type.svep | report | sv |
dc.contributor.organization | Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg | sv |