Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGustafsson, Frida
dc.contributor.authorGustavsson, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-12T06:59:19Z
dc.date.available2019-07-12T06:59:19Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/61228
dc.description.abstractThe returns of potential investments are interesting for every investor. In this thesis we compared two financial models that are often used to predict expected returns of portfolios with different financial instruments. The studied models are the Capital Asset Pricing Model, CAPM, and the Fama-French Three-Factor Model, what we in this thesis call FF3. We did our research on the Swedish Stock Market between January 2014 and January 2019, a 5-year period of monthly observations. We constructed 6 portfolios, differentiated by size and book-to-market ratio. FF3 performed better than CAPM in terms of producing significant coefficients, having lower variance in the residuals and in the ability to estimate overall higher coefficient of determination. However, the effectiveness of FF3 diminishes while predicting the excess return for portfolios constructed of growth stocks.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseries201907:99sv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUppsatssv
dc.titleTesting the Performance of the Capital Asset Pricing Model and the Fama-French Three-Factor Model - A study on the Swedish Stock Market between 2014-2019sv
dc.title.alternativeTesting the Performance of the Capital Asset Pricing Model and the Fama-French Three-Factor Model - A study on the Swedish Stock Market between 2014-2019sv
dc.typetext
dc.setspec.uppsokSocialBehaviourLaw
dc.type.uppsokM2
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Gothenburg/Department of Economicseng
dc.contributor.departmentGöteborgs universitet/Institutionen för nationalekonomi med statistikswe
dc.type.degreeStudent essay


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record