Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFuente, David
dc.contributor.authorKabubo-Mariara, Jane
dc.contributor.authorKimuyu, Peter
dc.contributor.authorMwaura, Mbutu
dc.contributor.authorWhittington, Dale
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-06T16:19:04Z
dc.date.available2020-08-06T16:19:04Z
dc.date.issued2017-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/66054
dc.descriptionJEL Codes: Q25, L95, D63sv
dc.description.abstractPolicy makers and utility managers can use a variety of tariff structures to calculate customers’ bills for water and sanitation services, ranging from a simple flat monthly fee to complicated multipart tariffs with seasonal pricing based on metered water use. This paper examines the performance of alternative tariff structures for water and wastewater services in Nairobi, Kenya. In particular, we evaluate the performance of alternative tariffs relative to several criteria: the overall quantity of water sold (i.e., conservation), the magnitude of the total subsidy delivered through the tariff, subsidy incidence, change in customer welfare, and change in social welfare. To accomplish this, we develop a dynamic tariff simulation model and use a complete set of billing records from Nairobi City Water and Sewer Company to model the performance of alternative tariff structures. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we find that tariff alternatives with a uniform volumetric price perform as well as or better than increasing block tariff alternatives across nearly all policy-relevant metrics of tariff performance. These findings hold at the three levels of cost recovery that we consider and are robust to a wide range of assumptions about consumer behavior. This finding stands in stark contrast to the widespread use of increasing block tariffs (IBTs) in low and middle-income countries and to current perceptions of best practice in tariff design. Additionally, we find that neither the size of the lifeline block nor the number of blocks affects the relative performance of the IBT tariff alternatives in a policy-relevant manner. Finally, our simulations underscore the benefits of getting utilities on a path to improved cost recovery. This will be essential to ensuring governments have the resources to invest in climate resilient infrastructure and to meet the Sustainable Development Goals’ aspiration of ensuring universal access to safe water and sanitation services.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion Paper Seriessv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDP 17-21sv
dc.subjecttariff simulationsv
dc.subjectwater pricingsv
dc.subjectsanitation,sv
dc.subjectincreasing block tariffsv
dc.subjectKenya,sv
dc.subjectAfricasv
dc.titleAssessing the Performance of Alternative Water and Sanitation Tariffs: The Case of Nairobi, Kenyasv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.svepothersv
dc.contributor.organizationCorresponding author: David Fuente, The School of Earth, Ocean and Environment, University of South Carolina, 701 Sumter Street, EWS 617, Columbia SC 29208, USA, email: fuente@seoe.sc.edu. Jane Kabubo-Mariara, Partnership for Economic Policy (PEP), Kenya, School of Economics, University of Nairobi, Kenya. Peter Kimuyu, Commission for Revenue Allocation, Kenya. Mbutu Mwaura, Nairobi City Water and Sewer Company, Kenya. Dale Whittington, Department of City and Regional Planning, UNC-CH, USA, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering - Gillings School of Global Public Health, UNC-CH, USA, Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, UK.sv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record