Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPehrsson, Tobias
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-01T10:34:35Z
dc.date.available2020-09-01T10:34:35Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-01
dc.identifier.isbnhttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/66066
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/66066
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation is concerned with the concept of entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and, more specifically, the question ‘Why are firms conducting entrepreneurial actions?’ This question rests upon two premises. First, entrepreneurial actions represent an important domain of scientific inquiry. Essentially, this makes the concept of EO, wherein entrepreneurial actions are treated as equivalent to that of the concept of EO (i.e., engaging in innovation, proactively entering new markets, and engaging in risky ventures), relevant for investigation. Second, to adequately answer the question, the concept of EO needs to be reconceptualized. More precisely, I argue that (1) EO represents a form of being; that is, a firm either is or is not ‘entrepreneurially oriented’, a necessary condition for conducting entrepreneurial actions; however, (2) EO is not the same as entrepreneurial actions; that is, being entrepreneurially oriented is not the same as the actions that are to be explained. This dissertation consists of four appended papers that, together with seven chapters, serve to provide an answer to the question raised above. What the joint retroductive analysis clarifies has to do with the nature of being entrepreneurially oriented. In particular, the nature of EO concerns a practitioner’s (a) belief in the existence of an opportunity to actualize profits; (b) belief that there are ways of combining resources in a profitable manner; and (c) social identity embracing such beliefs. As such, the dissertation reconceptualizes EO. Specifically, it constructs the ‘actualization approach to entrepreneurial orientation’. It allows scholars to explain (1) why entrepreneurial actions exists, (2) that EO is not what EO does (i.e., innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking) but what it is capable of doing, and (3) that EO is an individual-level (not firm- or unit-level) concept that matters for entrepreneurial actions at various levels. Implications for practitioners and policy makers are discussed.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.haspart1. Pehrsson, A., and Pehrsson, T. (2015). Competition barriers and foreign subsidiary performance: Propositions on the moderating role of strategic orientation, International Journal of Business Competition and Growth, Vol. 4, No. 1/2, pp. 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBCG.2015.070661 2. Pehrsson, T. (2020) ‘Do types of strategic orientations make a difference? A study of MNCs’ performance in foreign markets’, European Business Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 26-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-03-2018-0071 3. Pehrsson, T. Why are firms entrepreneurially oriented? Towards the actualization approach of EO, To be submitted to Journal of Business Venturing. 4. Pehrsson, T. Explaining entrepreneurial re-orientation: The role of the transformative push, To be submitted to Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.sv
dc.subjectentrepreneurial orientationsv
dc.subjectactualization approachsv
dc.subjectentrepreneurial actionssv
dc.titleWhy are firms conducting entrepreneurial actions?sv
dc.title.alternativeTowards a reconceptualization of entrepreneurial orientationsv
dc.typeText
dc.type.svepDoctoral thesiseng
dc.gup.mailtobias.pehrsson@gu.sesv
dc.type.degreeDoctor of Philosophysv
dc.gup.originGöteborgs universitet. Handelshögskolansv
dc.gup.departmentDepartment of Business Administration ; Företagsekonomiska institutionensv
dc.gup.defenceplaceFredagen den 25 september 2020, kl. 10.15, sal B44, Handelshögskolan, Vasagatan 1sv
dc.gup.defencedate2020-09-25
dc.gup.dissdb-fakultetHHF


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record