dc.contributor.author | Artonius, Tove | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-08T08:31:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-08T08:31:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-09-08 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/66367 | |
dc.description.abstract | The initiative of the European pillar of social rights was supposed to bring the European Union one
step closer towards a more social Europe and the European Parliament (EP) approved the final
resolution in January 2017. However, the result of this resolution revealed some interesting voting
behavior of the European people’s party (EPP). This thesis will examine how the decisions made by
the Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) can be understood based on the self-interest of the
politician and what trade-off they make when operating under the influence of both their national
party and their party group in the EP. The thesis treats the MEP that represented Sweden — voting
against the EPSR and Ireland — voting for the EPSR during the EP debate and the arguments they
gave for the position they took on the EPSR. The arguments will be used as indicative of the MEPs
motivations with use of the decision-making theory and agency dilemma as theoretical framework.
This qualitative research offers empirical information on the decisions of the individual MEPs. | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.subject | Decision-making; election-seeking; policy-seeking; office-seeking | sv |
dc.title | THE MEPS OF THE EPP AND THE EUROPEAN PILLAR OF SOCIAL RIGHTS - Voting to serve Europe, the nation or themselves? | sv |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.setspec.uppsok | SocialBehaviourLaw | |
dc.type.uppsok | M2 | |
dc.contributor.department | Göteborgs universitet/Statsvetenskapliga institutionen | swe |
dc.contributor.department | University of Gothenburg/Department of Political Science | eng |
dc.type.degree | Student essay | |