dc.contributor.author | Gramson, Maja-Louisa | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-31T09:22:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-31T09:22:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-08-31 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/69470 | |
dc.description.abstract | Radicalization is one of the major problems of our time. If it is not prevented, extremism can
turn into terrorism which is a threat of the democracy. Previous research shows that social
policy approaches are important for successful counter-terrorism work. Research also shows
that too little focus on social problems can lead to increased radicalization. The question is to
which extent Sweden's and the EU's strategy documents are characterized by a social policy
approach to terrorism?
The purpose of this work is to examine to which extend the EU and Sweden are characterized
by social policy approaches in their strategy documents against terrorism studied in
accordance with Moghaddam's staircase model.
In order to achieve the purpose, a selection of strategy documents from the EU and Sweden is
analyzed through the staircase model. Moghaddam explains the radicalization process through
six steps to the final step, "terrorism". By applying the model to the strategy documents, the
aim is to analyze to which extent the EU's and Sweden's strategies are related to socio –
political approaches in their strategy documents against terrorism in relation to Moghadam's
theory.
The results from the analysis show that Sweden's strategies are based on “promote”, “prevent”
and “discourage”. EU strategies are based on “prediction”, “prevention”, “protection” and
“reaction”. The strategies aim to counteract push factors such as social exclusion. According
to Moghaddam's first step in the model, push factors affect pre-radicalization, which must be
prevented on time.
The first steps during a radicalization process are crucial for how the problem is to be solved
through different strategies. The EU's and Sweden's social-political approach is to promote
education, knowledge and critical thinking and offer young people support and security. The
higher up an individual moves in the staircase model, the more difficult it becomes to apply
strategies that work. | sv |
dc.language.iso | swe | sv |
dc.subject | Våldsbejakande extremism, Radikalisering, Terrorism, Rekrytering, Förebyggande arbete, Strategi, Europaparlamentet, Kommissionen, Rådet, Regeringen, Säkerhetspolitiskt, Socialpolitiskt, Moghaddams trappstegsmodell | sv |
dc.title | EU:S OCH SVERIGES SOCIALPOLITISKA FÖRHÅLLNINGSSÄTT TILL FÖREBYGGANDET AV TERRORISM - En kvalitativ studie av strategidokument | sv |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.setspec.uppsok | SocialBehaviourLaw | |
dc.type.uppsok | M2 | |
dc.contributor.department | Göteborgs universitet/Statsvetenskapliga institutionen | swe |
dc.contributor.department | University of Gothenburg/Department of Political Science | eng |
dc.type.degree | Student essay | |