| dc.description.abstract | Media's framing can arguably affect how media consumers view causes, consequences, and solutions
of different social issues such as climate change. Likewise, newspaper editorials have different ideas
and approaches to climate change, which may be influenced by their ideological positions. This study
aims to research if climate change narratives differ between editorials with different ideological
tendencies. To achieve this, three Swedish newspapers where studied: Aftonbladet (“unattached
social democratic”), Svenska Dagbladet (“unattached conservative”) and Dagens Nyheter (“unattached liberal”). A qualitative content analysis was performed on editorials in 2018 and 2019 containing the word “klimatförändring*” (a truncation of the phrase “climate change”). The material was analyzed using a theoretical framework described by Norton and Hulme (2019) containing four different climate change narratives, Lukewarmer, Ecoactivist, Smart Growth Reformer and Ecomodernist. The following questions were posed in the study: Can the four narratives be found in Swedish editorials? Have the narratives of the individual newspapers changed during the chosen time period? Do these newspaper editorials express different climate change narratives depending on their
ideology? The narratives can be found in the analyzed newspapers, however no major changes were discernable over the time periods. The type of narratives found in the editorials seem to correspond to its expressed ideological views. | sv |
