dc.contributor.author | Bäckrud, Stina | |
dc.contributor.author | Kjellberg, Annie | |
dc.contributor.author | Rosensohn, Sarah | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-01T12:30:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-01T12:30:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-07-01 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2077/72552 | |
dc.description.abstract | One of the most recent climate initiatives of the European Union (EU) is the Taxonomy
Regulation (EU/2020/852), a tool to redirect capital towards sustainable investment and to
achieve the goals set in Agenda 2030 and the Paris Agreement. The taxonomy’s classification
system is a predetermined and union-wide definition of sustainable economic activities,
risking to be in conflict with different local perceptions of what is sustainable. In Gothenburg
municipality’s energy plan, bioenergy plays an important role in the local energy system and
in the transition towards climate neutrality, with several investments being planned in the
coming years. Bioenergy is one of the taxonomy’s most controversial economic activities,
recently reclassified from a transitional to a green economic activity. Previous literature
illustrates a skepticism towards the taxonomy’s effectiveness, suggesting that it might stifle
innovation. The thesis therefore aims to assess whether the taxonomy is an effective
regulation by identifying how the taxonomy influences municipal investment plans in
bioenergy. By conducting interviews with municipal and private energy actors, it was
discovered that all bioenergy investments in Gothenburg’s energy plan are estimated to be in
compliance with the taxonomy. However, regardless if bioenergy investments are compliant
or noncompliant, the taxonomy imposes uncertainties as well as financial- and reputational
challenges for the municipal and local actors’ investment plans. By comparing the empirical
data with concepts presented in the Porter Hypothesis, there are indications that the taxonomy
is an ineffective regulation, at least regarding bioenergy investments. The empirical data
further suggest an ambiguity within Gothenburg municipality whether it is important to strive
towards taxonomy compliance or not. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Environmental Management/Uthålligt företagande 21/22:15 | en_US |
dc.subject | EU Taxonomy, Investment strategies, Bioenergy, Energy planning, Municipality, the Porter Hypothesis | en_US |
dc.title | The Effects of the EU Taxonomy on Municipal Energy Investment Plans - A qualitative study exploring the effects of the EU taxonomy in bioenergy investment strategies related to the energy plan of Gothenburg municipality | en_US |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.setspec.uppsok | SocialBehaviourLaw | |
dc.type.uppsok | M2 | |
dc.contributor.department | University of Gothenburg/Department of Business Administration | eng |
dc.contributor.department | Göteborgs universitet/Företagsekonomiska institutionen | swe |
dc.type.degree | Student essay | |