Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJonsson, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2008-02-22T12:26:56Z
dc.date.available2008-02-22T12:26:56Z
dc.date.issued2008-02-22T12:26:56Z
dc.identifier.issn0349-8034
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/9593
dc.description.abstractHeckman’s two-step procedure (Heckit) for estimating the parameters in linear models from censored data is frequently used by econometricians, despite of the fact that earlier studies cast doubt on the procedure. In this paper it is shown that estimates of the hazard h for approaching the censoring limit, the latter being used as an explanatory variable in the second step of the Heckit, can induce multicollinearity. The influence of the censoring proportion and sample size upon bias and variance in three types of random linear models are studied by simulations. From these results a simple relation is established that describes how absolute bias depends on the censoring proportion and the sample size. It is also shown that the Heckit may work with non-normal (Laplace) distributions, but it collapses if h deviates too much from that of the normal distribution. Data from a study of work resumption after sick-listing are used to demonstrate that the Heckit can be very risky.en
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Social Insurance Board in Sweden (RFV), Dnr 3124/99 –UFUen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch Reporten
dc.relation.ispartofseries2008:2en
dc.subjectCensoringen
dc.subjectCross-sectional and panel dataen
dc.subjectHazarden
dc.subjectMulticollinearityen
dc.titleWhen does Heckman’s two-step procedure for censored data work and when does it not?en
dc.typeTexten
dc.type.svepreporten
dc.gup.originUniversity of Gothenburg. School of Business, Economics and Lawen
dc.gup.departmentDepartment of Economicsen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record