Emotions, Morality and Public Goods: The WTA-WTP Disparity Revisited

dc.contributor.authorNilsson, Andreasswe
dc.contributor.authorJohansson-Stenman, Olofswe
dc.contributor.authorBiel, Andersswe
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Economicsswe
dc.date.accessioned2006-01-25swe
dc.date.accessioned2007-02-09T11:14:54Z
dc.date.available2007-02-09T11:14:54Z
dc.date.issued2006swe
dc.description.abstractEmpirical evidence suggests that people’s maximum willingness to pay for having a good is often substantially lower than their minimum willingness to accept not having it, and that this discrepancy tends to be especially large when valuing public goods. This paper hypothesizes that differences in emotions (e.g. regret) and moral perceptions can account for much of this discrepancy for public goods. A simple, real-money dichotomous-choice experiment is set up to test these hypotheses, which are largely supported.swe
dc.format.extent19 pagesswe
dc.format.extent92418 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.gup.epcid4683swe
dc.gup.originGöteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Lawswe
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465swe
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/2728
dc.language.isoenswe
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economics, nr 193swe
dc.subjectWillingness to pay; Willingness to accept gap; Endowment effect; Emotions; Ethics; Experimentsswe
dc.subject.svepEconomicsswe
dc.titleEmotions, Morality and Public Goods: The WTA-WTP Disparity Revisitedswe
dc.type.svepReportswe

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
gunwpe0193.pdf
Size:
90.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections