Automatic tumour segmentation in brain images: moving towards clinical implementation

dc.contributor.authorEmilia, Gryska
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-16T08:04:47Z
dc.date.available2022-09-16T08:04:47Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-16
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this thesis was to examine and enhance the scientific groundwork for translating deep learning (DL) algorithms for brain tumour segmentation into clinical decision support tools. Paper II describes a scoping review conducted to map the field of automatic brain lesion segmentation on magnetic resonance (MR) images according to a predefined and peer-reviewed study protocol (Paper I). Insufficient preprocessing description was identified as one factor hindering clinical implementation of the reviewed algorithms. A reproducibility and replicability analysis of two algorithms was described in Paper III. The two algorithms and their validation studies were previously assessed as reproducible. In this experimental investigation, the original validation results were reproduced and replicated for one algorithm. Analysing the reasons for failure to reproduce validation of the second algorithm led to a suggested update to a commonly-used reproducibility checklist; the importance of a thorough description of preprocessing was highlighted. In Paper IV, radiologists' perception of DL-generated brain tumour labels in tumour volume growth assessment was examined. Ten radiologists participated in a reading/questionnaire session of 20 MR examination cases. The readers were confident that the label-derived volume change is more accurate than their visual assessment, even when the inter-rater agreement on the label quality was poor. In Paper V, the broad theme of trust in artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology was explored. A semi-structured interview study with twenty-six AI implementation stakeholders was conducted. Four requirements of the implemented tools and procedures were identified that promote trust in AI: reliability, quality control, transparency, and inter-organisational compatibility. The findings indicate that current strategies to validate DL algorithms do not suffice to assess their accuracy in a clinical setting. Despite the recognition from radiologists that DL algorithms can improve the accuracy of tumour volume assessment, implementation strategies require more work and the involvement of multiple stakeholders.en
dc.gup.defencedate2022-10-07
dc.gup.defenceplaceFredagen den 7 oktober 2022, kl. 13.00, Hörsal Arvid Carlsson, Academicum, Medicinaregatan 3, Göteborgen
dc.gup.departmentInstitute of Clinical Sciences. Department of Radiation Physicsen
dc.gup.dissdb-fakultetSA
dc.gup.mailemilia.gryska@gmail.comen
dc.gup.originUniversity of Gothenburg. Sahlgrenska Academyen
dc.identifier.isbn978-91-8009-935-6 (PRINT)
dc.identifier.isbn978-91-8009-936-3 (PDF)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2077/72056
dc.language.isoengen
dc.relation.haspartGryska, E. A., Schneiderman, J., & Heckemann, R. A. Automatic brain lesion segmentation on standard MRIs of the human head: a scoping review protocol. BMJ open 2019; 9(2), e024824. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024824en
dc.relation.haspartGryska, E., Schneiderman, J., Björkman-Burtscher, I. M., & Heckemann, R. A. Automatic brain lesion segmentation on standard magnetic resonance images: a scoping review. BMJ open, 2021; 11(1), e042660. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042660en
dc.relation.haspartGryska, E., Björkman-Burtscher, I. M., Jakola, A. S., Dunås, T., Schneiderman, J., & Heckemann, R. A. Deep learning for automatic brain tumour segmentation on MRI: evaluation of recommended reporting criteria via a reproduction and replication study. BMJ open, 2022; 12. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059000en
dc.relation.haspartGryska, E., Hoefling, N., Laesser, M., Heckemann, R. A., Schneiderman, J., & Björkman-Burtscher, I. M. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced tumour volume increase in glioblastoma patients: radiologists’ perception of tumour segmentation and volumetry. Submitted to European Radiologyen
dc.relation.haspartBergquist, M., Rolandsson, B., Gryska, E., Laesser, M., Hoefling, N., Heckemann, R. A., Schneiderman, J., & Björkman-Burtscher, I. M. Trust and stakeholder perspectives on the implementation of AI tools in clinical radiology. Submitted to European Radiologyen
dc.subjectbrain tumour segmentationen
dc.subjectimplementationen
dc.subjectdeep learningen
dc.subjectradiologyen
dc.titleAutomatic tumour segmentation in brain images: moving towards clinical implementationen
dc.typetexteng
dc.type.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (Health Care Sciences)en
dc.type.svepDoctoral thesiseng

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Kappa v2.pdf
Size:
1.74 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Thesis frame
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
spikningsblad - updated.pdf
Size:
60.8 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Abstract
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Korrektur_Gryska.pdf
Size:
2.76 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Cover

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.68 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: