A Note on the Risk Behavior and Death of Homo Economicus

dc.contributor.authorJohansson-Stenman, Olofswe
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Economicsswe
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-05swe
dc.date.accessioned2007-02-09T11:14:31Z
dc.date.available2007-02-09T11:14:31Z
dc.date.issued2006swe
dc.description.abstractRecent papers by Cox and Sadiraj (2006) and Rubinstein (2006) have pointed out that expected utility theory is more general than has sometimes been acknowledged, and can hence not be refuted as easily by means of experiments. While acknowledging this fact, this note nevertheless demonstrates that typical risk experimental results are impossible to reconcile with conventional dynamic consumption theory under risk, where people are time consistent and integrate all sources of income perfectly.swe
dc.format.extent11 pagesswe
dc.format.extent85590 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.gup.epcid4993swe
dc.gup.originGöteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Lawswe
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465swe
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/2693
dc.language.isoenswe
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economics, nr 221swe
dc.subjectThe Rabin critique; expected utility of income; expected utility of final wealth; dynamic consumption theory; risk experiments; imperfect income integration; prospect theoryswe
dc.subject.svepEconomicsswe
dc.titleA Note on the Risk Behavior and Death of Homo Economicusswe
dc.type.svepReportswe

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
gunwpe0221.pdf
Size:
83.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections