Corruption as a Self-Reinforcing “Trap”: Implications for Reform Strategy
| dc.contributor.author | Stephenson, Matthew C. | |
| dc.contributor.organization | QoG Institute | sv |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-09T12:24:22Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-08-09T12:24:22Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-06 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Corruption is widely believed to be a self-reinforcing phenomenon, in the sense that the incentive to engage in corrupt acts increases as corruption becomes more widespread in the relevant community. Leading scholars have argued that corruption’s self-reinforcing property implies that incremental anticorruption reforms cannot be effective, and that the only way to escape a high-corruption equilibrium “trap” is through a so-called “big bang” or “big push.” This widespread view is mistaken. After surveying the reasons corruption might be self-reinforcing (or in some cases self-limiting), this paper demonstrates that corruption’s self-reinforcing property does not imply the necessity of a “big bang” approach to reform, and indeed may strengthen the case for pursuing sustained, cumulative incremental anticorruption reforms. | sv |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1653-8919 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/61453 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers | sv |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2019:10 | sv |
| dc.relation.uri | https://qog.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1737/1737653_2019_10_stephenson.pdf | sv |
| dc.title | Corruption as a Self-Reinforcing “Trap”: Implications for Reform Strategy | sv |
| dc.type | Text | sv |
| dc.type.svep | article, other scientific | sv |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- gupea_2077_61453_1.pdf
- Size:
- 834.79 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 4.68 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: