Payment Types and Participation in Payment for Ecosystem Services Programs: Stated Preferences of Landowners

dc.contributor.authorNordén, Anna
dc.contributor.organizationDept. of Economics, University of Gothenburgsv
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-28T08:46:20Z
dc.date.available2014-04-28T08:46:20Z
dc.date.issued2014-04
dc.descriptionJEL: Q28; Q57sv
dc.description.abstractBecause the effectiveness of payment for ecosystem services (PES) programs depends on landowners’ engagement, understanding the relationship between the type of payment and participation is a key issue. This paper reports on a choice experiment that quantifies landowners’ preferences for cash and educational in-kind payment. The main results indicate a positive correlation between participation in a PES contract and the magnitude of the cash payment, while participation seems uncorrelated with the magnitude of the educational inkind payment. In addition, we investigate the mix of payment types and heterogeneity in preferences, which can help policymakers design strategies to increase participation.sv
dc.format.extent46sv
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/35726
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economicssv
dc.relation.ispartofseries591sv
dc.subjectpayment for ecosystem servicessv
dc.subjectcash paymentssv
dc.subjectin-kind paymentssv
dc.subjectstated preferencessv
dc.subjectland ownerssv
dc.titlePayment Types and Participation in Payment for Ecosystem Services Programs: Stated Preferences of Landownerssv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.svepreportsv

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
gupea_2077_35726_1.pdf
Size:
673.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.68 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections