Does Benefit Transfer Always Work: a Multi-country Comparison

dc.contributor.authorBelhaj, Mohammedswe
dc.contributor.authorAbou-Ali, Halaswe
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Economicsswe
dc.date.accessioned2005-02-07swe
dc.date.accessioned2007-02-09T11:15:21Z
dc.date.available2007-02-09T11:15:21Z
dc.date.issued2005swe
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyzes the welfare effects of a 50 percent reduction in air pollution caused by road traffic in both Cairo (Egypt) and Rabat-Salé (Morocco) using a contingent valuation method with identical elicitation questions. Despite the fact that both the numbers of inhabitants and vehicles are higher in Cairo the willingness to pay to reduce the impacts of vehicle emissions is higher in Rabat-Salé although incomes are rather similar in both cities. This paper shows that the relatively often-used benefit transfer frequently leads to biases where damage costs are under- or overestimated.swe
dc.format.extent13 pagesswe
dc.format.extent50997 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.gup.epcid4030swe
dc.gup.originGöteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Lawswe
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465swe
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/2767
dc.language.isoenswe
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economics, nr 158swe
dc.subjectAir pollution; Benefit transfer; Contingent valuation; Willingness to payswe
dc.subject.svepEconomicsswe
dc.titleDoes Benefit Transfer Always Work: a Multi-country Comparisonswe
dc.type.svepReportswe

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
gunwpe0158.pdf
Size:
49.8 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections