Svensson, Lottenvon Nordenskjöld, Catharina2020-07-012020-07-012020-07-01http://hdl.handle.net/2077/65403MSc in Accounting and Financial ManagementWe have performed a single case study of the public consultation process of an accounting standard with major financial implications, making it prone to induce intense lobbying. We studied the ability of the standard setting board, the IASB, to remain independent, i.e. not unduly affected, by either a stakeholder group or a certain type of comment. Our findings do not suggest any disproportionate stakeholder influence, nor any disproportionate favoring of a certain type of argument. This predominantly is aligned with previous literature.engInfluenceIFRS 16Accounting regulationAccounting standardIFRSIASBCIGTHE POLITICAL PROCESS OF STANDARD-SETTING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FINAL STANDARD - An examination of stakeholder influence in the due process of IFRS 16 LeasesText