• English
    • svenska
  • English 
    • English
    • svenska
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • School of Business, Economics and Law / Handelshögskolan
  • Department of Economics / Institutionen för nationalekonomi med statistik
  • Working papers
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • School of Business, Economics and Law / Handelshögskolan
  • Department of Economics / Institutionen för nationalekonomi med statistik
  • Working papers
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Soil Properties and Soil Conservation Investments in Agricultural Production - a Case study of Kenya’s Central Highlands

Abstract
This paper integrates traditional economic variables, soil properties and variables on soil conservation technologies in order to estimate agricultural output among small-scale farmers in Kenya’s central highlands. The study has methodological, empirical as well as policy results. The key methodological result is that integrating traditional economics and soil science is highly worthwhile in this area of research. Omitting measures of soil capital can cause omitted variables bias since farmers’ choice of inputs depend both on the quality and status of the soil capital and on other economic conditions such as availability and cost of labour, fertilizers, manure and other inputs. The study shows that: (i) models which include soil capital and soil conservation technologies yield a considerably lower output elasticity of farm-yard manure; (ii) mean output elasticities of key soil nutrients like nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) are positive and relatively large; (iii) counter to our expectations, the mean output elasticity of phosphorus (P) is negative; (iv) soil conservation technologies like green manure and terraces are positively associated with output and yield relatively large output elasticities. The central policy conclusion is that while fertilizers are generally beneficial, their application is a complex art and more is not necessarily better. The limited local market supply of fertilizers, combined with the different output effects of N, P and K, point at the importance of improving the performance of input markets and strengthening agricultural extension. Further, given the policy debate on the impact and usefulness of government subsidies to soil conservation, our results suggest that soil conservation investments contribute to increase farmers’ output. Consequently, government support to appropriate soil conservation investments arrests soil erosion, prevents downstream externalities and assists farmers’ efforts to increase food production and food security.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/2077/19233
Collections
  • Working papers
View/Open
gupea_2077_19233_1.pdf (296.2Kb)
Date
2009-01-27
Author
Ekbom, Anders
Sterner, Thomas
Keywords
micro analysis of farm firms
resource management
Publication type
report
ISSN
1403-2465
Series/Report no.
Working Papers in Economics
340
Language
eng
Metadata
Show full item record

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV