Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGolrokh, Reihaneh
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-17T12:34:39Z
dc.date.available2010-06-17T12:34:39Z
dc.date.issued2010-06-17
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/22607
dc.description.abstractThis essay makes sense of a confusing book that resists interpretation by putting the three novels in the trilogy into context with one another. The main idea is that they are all one and the same story told from different perspectives of a sole author turning the six main protagonists in only two. The New York Trilogy is an “anti-detective” mystery novel where three detectives struggle to make sense of their situations which are surrounded by what seems to be chance events. The contention of the essay is that the detectives are going through an identity crisis leading them to imagine that the objects of their chase have set them up through elaborate manipulations. However as the stories are narrated by the partial detectives they cannot be trusted as completely accurate as they are only told from their point of view.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSPL kandidatuppsats i engelskasv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSPL 2010-003sv
dc.subjectmysterysv
dc.subjectmanipulationsv
dc.subjectchancesv
dc.subjectdetectivesv
dc.subjectstrugglesv
dc.subjectcrisissv
dc.titleA Thread Of Manipulation & Staged Chance. An interpretation of Paul Auster's The New York Trilogysv
dc.typeText
dc.setspec.uppsokHumanitiesTheology
dc.type.uppsokM2
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Gothenburg/Department of Languages and Literatureseng
dc.contributor.departmentGöteborgs universitet/Institutionen för språk och litteraturerswe
dc.type.degreeStudent essay


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record