• English
    • svenska
  • English 
    • English
    • svenska
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Student essays / Studentuppsatser
  • Department of Conservation / Institutionen för kulturvård
  • Kandidatuppsatser / Institutionen för Kulturvård
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Student essays / Studentuppsatser
  • Department of Conservation / Institutionen för kulturvård
  • Kandidatuppsatser / Institutionen för Kulturvård
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Förändra, förbättra, förnya? Retuschering av medeltida kalkmåleri

Change, improve, renew? Retouching of medieval mural paintings

Abstract
The aim of this paper is to take a critical look at retouching of medieval mural paintings in Sweden. This is done by firstly examining the different methods of retouching, including the materials used. Secondary it tries to answer the question of which intentions have guided the conservator’s decisions dealing with the retouching. The medieval mural paintings in Swedish churches have three major functions today. It has to work as a part of a modern church and does so by giving the room a sense of the many changes of the religious cult but at the same time it works as a reminder of the historical continuity of the Christian religion. At the same time it has to function as a work of art, which means that it has an aesthetical dimension. The third function is as a historical source, which requires a minimum of retouching to be trustable. This paper examines how the retouching affects the different functions of the mural paintings as stated above. The questions are then applied to four different churches to give an example from real life of how the retouching has been done and how it affects the pictures. Two of the churches, Bjäresjö church and Västra Sallerup church, are in Skåne and two, Husaby church and Götene church, are in Västergötland. Changes in the methods and ethics are recorded over time, going towards a minimum intervention, with the exception of Mandelgren’s restoration of Bjäresjö in 1852, but there is no obvious geographical difference.
Degree
Student essay
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/2077/22722
Collections
  • Kandidatuppsatser / Institutionen för Kulturvård
View/Open
gupea_2077_22722_1.pdf (8.316Mb)
Date
2010-06-29
Author
Rudling, Kajsa
Keywords
mural painting
wall painting
retouching
Series/Report no.
ISRN GU/KUV—10/17—SE
Language
swe
Metadata
Show full item record

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV