Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMazeikaite, Daivaswe
dc.contributor.authorBagaviciute, Olgaswe
dc.date.accessioned2003-05-07swe
dc.date.accessioned2007-01-17T03:21:58Z
dc.date.available2007-01-17T03:21:58Z
dc.date.issued2003swe
dc.identifier.issn1403-851Xswe
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/2340
dc.description.abstractStock-based compensation plans are now a common feature of employee remuneration, not just for directors and senior executives, but for many other employees as well. However, regardless of the increasing use of stock-based payment, there is no existing International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) on how to account for these transactions. Concerns have been raised about this lack of an international standard. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in the United States and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) have recently been working on this topic. To date, all have agreed that all stock-based payment transactions should be recognised in the financial statements, resulting in an expense in the income statement. Already, in 1993, the FASB attempted to put into place an accounting standard that would require companies to treat stock options as an operating expense and incorporate them into their income statements. This proposed statement was strongly opposed by companies. There are several questions which can be asked about stock-based compensation, namely: • Should companies expense stock options? • How should stock options be valued? • Is granting an option a once-only expense for companies or is it a contingent liability, the potential cost of which changes with fluctuations in market price of companies’ shares and the final cost of which becomes clear when options are exercised or expire? The standard-setting bodies, IASB and FASB in this thesis, and the companies have different answers with regard to these questions. We will examine what issues bring up the most controversy and what are the more accepted answers when it comes to implementing the accounting for stock options in practice. We review the stock option pricing models available to date and distinguish their drawbacks when they are applied to value employee stock option plans. We selected thirty two Comment Letters from the vast number of those submitted by various companies with regard to proposed standards and we looked into accounting practices of these companies in order to see which alternatives of accounting for stock-based compensation expense these companies have chosen.swe
dc.format.extent101 pagesswe
dc.format.extent644244 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenswe
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMasters Thesis, nr 2002:61swe
dc.subjectshare-based compensation expenseswe
dc.subjectstock-based compensation expenseswe
dc.subjectstock option planswe
dc.subjectIASBswe
dc.subjectFASBswe
dc.subjectoption pricing modelswe
dc.subjectintrinsic valueswe
dc.subjectfair valueswe
dc.subjectComment Letters.swe
dc.titleACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANSswe
dc.setspec.uppsokSocialBehaviourLawswe
dc.type.uppsokDswe
dc.contributor.departmentGöteborgs universitet/Graduate Business Schoolswe
dc.type.degreeStudent essayswe
dc.gup.originGöteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Lawswe
dc.gup.epcid2792swe


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record