Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTullberg, Mariaswe
dc.date.accessioned2006-12-04swe
dc.date.accessioned2007-02-13T12:57:06Z
dc.date.available2007-02-13T12:57:06Z
dc.date.issued2000swe
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/2972
dc.description.abstractChange is easy to decide upon and to plan, but hard to implement. This paper deals with the paradox that despite the most favourable conditions, such as consensus and abundant resources, the outcome of all the efforts is still so very doubtful. This narrative of a change project in a big organisation will show how various attempts to de-institutionalise organisational processes simply succeed in reinforcing existing institutions. An analysis that combines psychodynamic and institutional theory will be used for a deeper understanding of the counter-productive influence of anxiety in relation to the actors' overt intentions, and how the outcome of support for change can cause a regression to familiar patterns in the ongoing processes, instead of generating new paths.swe
dc.format.extent111782 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenswe
dc.subjectconference paperswe
dc.titleDeadweight or Turbokick? On support for line management and the implementation of change.swe
dc.type.svepReportswe
dc.contributor.departmentGothenburg Research Instituteswe
dc.gup.originGöteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Lawswe
dc.gup.epcid1914swe
dc.subject.svepPsychologyswe


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record