Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCzarniawska, Barbaraswe
dc.date.accessioned2006-11-21swe
dc.date.accessioned2007-02-13T12:57:13Z
dc.date.available2007-02-13T12:57:13Z
dc.date.issued2006swe
dc.identifier.issn1400-4801swe
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/2983
dc.description.abstractIn the present text, an institution is understood to be an (observable) pattern of collective action, justified by a corresponding social norm. By this definition, an institution emerges slowly, although it may be helped or hindered by various specific acts. From this perspective, an institutional entrepreneur is an oxymoron, at least in principle. In practice, however, there are and always have been people trying to create institutions. This paper describes the emergence of London School of Economics and Political Science as an institution and analyzes its founders and its supporters during crises as institutional entrepreneurs. A tentative theory of the phenomenon of institutional entrepreneurship inspired by an actor-network theory is then tested on two other cases described in brief.swe
dc.format.extent32 pagesswe
dc.format.extent289096 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenswe
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGRI reports, nr 2006:7swe
dc.subjecthigher educationswe
dc.subjectinstitutionsswe
dc.subjectentrepreneursswe
dc.subjectactor-network theoryswe
dc.titleEmerging Institutions: Pyramids or Anthills?swe
dc.type.svepReportswe
dc.contributor.departmentGothenburg Research Instituteswe
dc.gup.originGöteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Lawswe
dc.gup.epcid4971swe
dc.subject.svepBusiness studiesswe


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record