Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCorvellec, Hervéswe
dc.date.accessioned2006-12-05swe
dc.date.accessioned2007-02-13T12:57:50Z
dc.date.available2007-02-13T12:57:50Z
dc.date.issued2000swe
dc.identifier.issn1400-4801swe
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/3039
dc.description.abstractThis paper retraces and analyzes the debate around a major infrastructure project in central Stockholm, the construction of a third railroad track over the islet of Riddarholm. Using the analytical framework of the New Rhetoric (Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca 1958), it shows that the debate is not only a matter of diverging views about the necessity or the impact of the project but, as well, a matter of epistemology. Whereas both sides tend to refer to similar values and make use of matching rhetorical devices, they differ quite radically as to which knowledge they regard as valid and as to how they have organized their approach to the debate. Demonstration faces argumentation, the New Rhetoric suggests, as its contribution to our understanding of the genesis of urban projects.swe
dc.format.extent40 pagesswe
dc.format.extent214790 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenswe
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGRI reports, nr 2000:8swe
dc.subjectUrban project; City management; infrastructure; third track; Railroads; Stockholmswe
dc.titleTalks on Tracks - Debating Urban Infrastructure Projectsswe
dc.type.svepReportswe
dc.contributor.departmentGothenburg Research Instituteswe
dc.gup.originGöteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Lawswe
dc.gup.epcid1485swe
dc.subject.svepBusiness studiesswe


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record