Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHelander, Emma
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-27T15:11:05Z
dc.date.available2013-06-27T15:11:05Z
dc.date.issued2013-06-27
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/33233
dc.description.abstractThe tension between truth and fiction is central in Ian McEwan's "Atonement", since the main character, Briony, turns out to be both the narrating I and the experiencing I. The aim of this essay is to find out how it is possible for Briony to be both author ad character. I use the theory of narratology as described by Manfred Jahn to look at some of the devices Briony uses to tell her own story. I also compare the difference between the first and the second reading, because I argue that once you know that Briony is the actual narrator, she becomes more overt. The main result is that being the narrator of as well as the character in her own story is the only way for Briony to command the truth.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSPL kandidatuppsats i engelskasv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSPL 2013-023sv
dc.subjectcommanding the truthsv
dc.subjecttruth and fictionsv
dc.subjectBrionysv
dc.subjectAtonementsv
dc.subjectIan McEwansv
dc.subjectnarratologysv
dc.subjectManfred Jahnsv
dc.subjectnarrating Isv
dc.subjectfocalizationsv
dc.titleCommanding the Truth: A Narrative Reading of Ian McEwan's "Atonement"sv
dc.typeText
dc.setspec.uppsokHumanitiesTheology
dc.type.uppsokM2
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Gothenburg/Department of Languages and Literatureseng
dc.contributor.departmentGöteborgs universitet/Institutionen för språk och litteraturerswe
dc.type.degreeStudent essay


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record