Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEmmoth, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorPalmelind, Sheida
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-24T12:48:02Z
dc.date.available2014-06-24T12:48:02Z
dc.date.issued2014-06-24
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/36102
dc.description.abstractThis thesis intends to examine a risk measure used for estimating a potential future loss. The risk measure Value-at-Risk, is widely used throughout the world of financial risk management. We will examine different approaches to computing Value-at-Risk for two equity portfolios, one univariate portfolio and one multivariate portfolio. We assume that portfolio losses have a certain distribution. Even though Value-at-Risk is widely used and accepted within financial management, Value-at-Risk is not a coherent risk measure. We will therefore include another risk measure in our thesis, the so-called Expected Shortfall. What we find is that our assumption considering portfolio losses are not valid for all methods of computing Value-at-Risk. Methods investigated in this thesis are not suitable for capturing more extreme losses that occur during periods of market turbulences.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseries201406:245sv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUppsatssv
dc.titleValue-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall - Managing risk for an equity portfoliosv
dc.title.alternativeValue-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall - Managing risk for an equity portfoliosv
dc.typetext
dc.setspec.uppsokSocialBehaviourLaw
dc.type.uppsokM2
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Gothenburg/Department of Economicseng
dc.contributor.departmentGöteborgs universitet/Institutionen för nationalekonomi med statistikswe
dc.type.degreeStudent essay


Files in this item

No Thumbnail [100%x80]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record