dc.contributor.author | Emmoth, Stefan | |
dc.contributor.author | Palmelind, Sheida | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-06-24T12:48:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-06-24T12:48:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-06-24 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/36102 | |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis intends to examine a risk measure used for estimating a potential future loss. The risk measure Value-at-Risk, is widely used throughout the world of financial risk management. We will examine different approaches to computing Value-at-Risk for two equity portfolios, one univariate portfolio and one multivariate portfolio. We assume that portfolio losses have a certain distribution. Even though Value-at-Risk is widely used and accepted within financial management, Value-at-Risk is not a coherent risk measure. We will therefore include another risk measure in our thesis, the so-called Expected Shortfall. What we find is that our assumption considering portfolio losses are not valid for all methods of computing Value-at-Risk. Methods investigated in this thesis are not suitable for capturing more extreme losses that occur during periods of market turbulences. | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 201406:245 | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Uppsats | sv |
dc.title | Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall - Managing risk for an equity portfolio | sv |
dc.title.alternative | Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall - Managing risk for an equity portfolio | sv |
dc.type | text | |
dc.setspec.uppsok | SocialBehaviourLaw | |
dc.type.uppsok | M2 | |
dc.contributor.department | University of Gothenburg/Department of Economics | eng |
dc.contributor.department | Göteborgs universitet/Institutionen för nationalekonomi med statistik | swe |
dc.type.degree | Student essay | |