Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSundström, Aksel
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-07T13:01:57Z
dc.date.available2015-05-07T13:01:57Z
dc.date.issued2014-10
dc.identifier.issn1653-8919
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/38890
dc.description.abstractThe last decades’ restructuring of public administrations has in numerous countries included the use of performance-related pay (PRP) programs. Such reforms have been said to reduce civil servants’ incentives for corrupt behavior and have therefore been promoted as an anticorruption tool. However, the article hypothesize that such schemes’ suppressing effect on corruption incentives is questionable in highly corrupt settings because the absence of noncorrupt senior managers—and hence independent performance evaluations—may lead to the capture of such programs. An in-depth study of reforms in the South African civil service provides micro-level insights to the process in which such reforms may fail. The investigation outline how PRP-bonuses are used as rewards from corrupt senior managers to colluding subordinates. Honest bureaucrats are instead isolated and receive no addition to their salary. These selective rewards make honest behavior increasingly costly and function as an incentive for civil servants to engage in bribery.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Paperssv
dc.relation.ispartofseries2014:11sv
dc.relation.urihttp://qog.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1500/1500744_2014_11_sundstr--m.pdfsv
dc.titleNot to be Used During Fire: Performance-related pay for civil servants as an anticorruption toolsv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.contributor.organizationQoG Institutesv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record