dc.contributor.author | Sundström, Aksel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-07T13:01:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-07T13:01:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-10 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1653-8919 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/38890 | |
dc.description.abstract | The last decades’ restructuring of public administrations has in numerous countries included the use of performance-related pay (PRP) programs. Such reforms have been said to reduce civil servants’ incentives for corrupt behavior and have therefore been promoted as an anticorruption tool. However, the article hypothesize that such schemes’ suppressing effect on corruption incentives is questionable in highly corrupt settings because the absence of noncorrupt senior managers—and hence independent performance evaluations—may lead to the capture of such programs. An in-depth study of reforms in the South African civil service provides micro-level insights to the process in which such reforms may fail. The investigation outline how PRP-bonuses are used as rewards from corrupt senior managers to colluding subordinates. Honest bureaucrats are instead isolated and receive no addition to their salary. These selective rewards make honest behavior increasingly costly and function as an incentive for civil servants to engage in bribery. | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2014:11 | sv |
dc.relation.uri | http://qog.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1500/1500744_2014_11_sundstr--m.pdf | sv |
dc.title | Not to be Used During Fire: Performance-related pay for civil servants as an anticorruption tool | sv |
dc.type | Text | sv |
dc.contributor.organization | QoG Institute | sv |