dc.contributor.author | Dahlström, Carl | |
dc.contributor.author | Lapuente, Victor | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-19T09:11:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-19T09:11:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-11 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1653-8919 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/39011 | |
dc.description.abstract | It is often stated that the public sector should be separated from politics and that an isolated bureaucracy, in this sense, is less prone to corruption. The cornerstone of such propositions is that the activities of politicians and administrators should be separated so that politicians dominate policy
making, while administrators dominate implementation. This paper investigates if the organizational characteristics aimed at isolating bureaucrats from politicians are correlated with lower levels of corruption in countries across the world. Using a unique dataset measuring features of the public
sector administration in 97 countries, we show that there is no empirical association between four
standard indicators of an isolated bureaucracy and low corruption. | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2011:14 | sv |
dc.relation.uri | http://qog.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1357/1357853_2011_14_dahlstrom_lapuente.pdf | sv |
dc.title | Myths of Corruption Prevention: What is (not) good with a Weberian Bureaucracy? | sv |
dc.type | Text | sv |
dc.contributor.organization | QoG Institute | sv |