| dc.description.abstract | This paper analyses citizens´ perception of corruption in Sweden along two dimensions: a) the
spread of corruption among public officials, politicians, and businessmen, and b) the degree of
acceptance for corrupt behaviors that violate the norm of impartiality, or in any other way represent
the exercise of power in the grey zone between legal and directly illegal behavior. Building on a
national representative sample from 2010, we show differences in perceptions of the occurrence
and acceptance of corruption in different sectors, among different segments of the Swedish population,
and for different types of corrupt behavior. Our results show differences between the private
and public sector. Businessmen are perceived as more corrupt than public sector employees, which,
in their turn, are perceived more corrupt than politicians. Similarly, Swedes believe that it is somewhat
more acceptable for a private actor with public power to breach the norm of impartiality, the
example being a private doctor letting a friend or close relative advance in the health care queue in
comparison to a public sector doctor. We also show that there are differences in the tolerance towards
different types of corruption in Swedish society, and that there are regional variations in the
acceptance of corruption. In particular, younger persons and citizens of the city of Gothenburg
show a somewhat more acceptable attitude towards corruption. The findings have implications for
understanding the scope and effects of new public management reforms. They also have implications
for understanding the effects of an increased exposure of corruption, and how exposure may
gradually shift norms in society and make corruption more acceptable. | sv |
