dc.contributor.author | Dahlström, Carl | |
dc.contributor.author | Lapuente, Victor | |
dc.contributor.author | Teorell, Jan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-21T09:42:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-21T09:42:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-06 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1653-8919 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/39052 | |
dc.description.abstract | Scholars have emphasized the importance of having a “Weberian bureaucracy” for the
socio-economic development of a country, but few attempts have been made to
measure public administrations according to their degree of Weberianism. This paper
presents the study and questionnaire design of a web survey covering 58 countries,
which embodies the largest cross-national dataset on the structure of public
administrations up to date. It also provides the main findings from the dataset: The
features often associated with a Weberian bureaucracy can neither theoretically nor
empirically be collapsed into a single dimension (Weberian versus a patronage-based
administration). Instead two distinct dimensions are identified, in the paper referred to
as professionalism (i.e. up to which extent bureaucracies are “professional” vis-à-vis
“politicized”) and closedness (i.e. up to which extent bureaucracies are more “closed”
or public-like vis-à-vis “open” or private-like). Finally, the paper validates these
dimensions with information from other available data sources, and demonstrates that
the results have not been produced by respondent perception bias. | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2010:13 | sv |
dc.relation.uri | http://qog.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1350/1350159_2010_13_dahlstrom_lapuente_teorell.pdf | sv |
dc.title | Dimensions of Bureaucracy: A Cross-National Dataset on the Structure and Behavior of Public Administration | sv |
dc.type | Text | sv |
dc.contributor.organization | QoG Institute | sv |