dc.contributor.author | Lapuente, Victor | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-28T10:49:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-28T10:49:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-11 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1653-8919 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/39140 | |
dc.description.abstract | Why some bureaucracies are autonomous regarding personnel policies? New
Political Economy approaches to public administrations tend to explain
bureaucratic autonomy as a result of the political exchange between citizens (or
interest groups) and rulers. The general prediction is that bureaucratic autonomy
increases with the degree of diffusion of political power among different agents.
Nevertheless, administrative history shows us that many political systems with
very restricted interactions between citizens and rulers created highly
autonomous bureaucracies. Using developments from organizational theory, this
paper focuses on an interaction that one can observe in all polities: the
relationship between rulers and public employees. The main hypothesis is that
polities where powers are highly concentrated tend to develop more autonomous
bureaucracies as a way to craft credible commitments towards public employees.
Only when rulers are exclusively concerned about civil servants’ loyalty, systems
with high diffusion of political power lead to highly autonomous bureaucracies.
Empirical examples from contemporary developing countries and narratives
from the historical development of bureaucracies in Europe illustrate these
hypotheses. | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers | sv |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2008:23 | sv |
dc.relation.uri | http://qog.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1350/1350674_2008_23_lapuente.pdf | sv |
dc.title | Why Bureaucracy? Political Power and the Emergence of Autonomous Bureaucracies | sv |
dc.type | Text | sv |
dc.contributor.organization | QoG Institute | sv |