Effectiveness of implant therapy in Sweden
Abstract
Dental implants are commonly used in restorative therapy in patients with partial
or full edentulism. Knowledge regarding the outcome of this kind of treatment has
been limited to evaluations of efficacy, i.e. therapy performed under optimal
conditions. The current series of studies evaluated effectiveness of dental implant
therapy including patient-reported outcomes, the occurrence of implant loss as
well as peri-implantitis.
Using the national data registry of the Swedish Social Insurance Agency, 4,716
patients were randomly selected. All had been provided with implant-supported
restorations in 2003/2004. Patient-reported outcomes were analyzed by
questionnaire 6 years after completion of therapy (Study I). Patient files of 2,765
patients were collected from more than 800 clinicians. Information on patients,
treatment procedures, and outcomes related to the implant-supported restorative
therapy was extracted from the files. 596 of the 2,765 subjects attended a clinical
examination 9 years after therapy. Early implant loss was assessed in patient files,
while late implant loss was recorded at the clinical examination (Study II). The
prevalence of peri-implantitis was determined from clinical and radiographic data
collected at the 9-year examination (Study III). Radiographs obtained from the
patient files were used to evaluate the onset and pattern of progression of periimplantitis
(Study IV).
It was demonstrated that:
- the overall patient satisfaction was high but influenced by (i) age and
gender of the patient, (ii) the extent of restorative therapy and (iii) the
training of the clinician performing the treatment (Study I).
- implant loss occurred in 7.6% of all patients over a follow-up of 9
years; patient and implant characteristics influenced the outcome
(Study II).
- 14.5% of all patients exhibited moderate/severe peri-implantitis, and
several patient- and implant-related characteristics were identified as
risk indicators (Study III).
- progression of peri-implantitis occurred in a non-linear, accelerating
pattern, and, in the majority of cases, the onset of the disease had
occurred early (Study IV).
Parts of work
Patient-reported outcomes of dental implant therapy in a large randomly selected sample.
Derks J, Håkansson J, Wennström JL, Klinge B, Berglundh T.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 May;26(5):586-91. doi: 10.1111/clr.12464.
::PMID::25123298 Effectiveness of implant therapy analyzed in a Swedish population: early and late implant loss.
Derks J, Håkansson J, Wennström JL, Tomasi C, Larsson M, Berglundh T.
J Dent Res. 2015 Mar;94(3 Suppl):44S-51S. doi: 10.1177/0022034514563077.
::PMID::25503901 Effectiveness of implant therapy analyzed
in a Swedish population: prevalence of peri-implantitis. Derks J, Schaller D, Håkansson J, Wennström JL, Tomasi C,
Berglundh T.
J Dent Res (2015) accepted for publication. Peri-implantitis - onset and pattern of
progression. Derks J, Schaller D, Håkansson J, Wennström JL, Tomasi C,
Berglundh T.
Manuscript.
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy (Odontology)
University
University of Gothenburg. Sahlgrenska Academy
Institution
Institute of Odontology. Department of Periodontology
Disputation
Fredagen den 16 oktober 2015, kl. 9.00, Hörsal F3, Odontologen, Medicinaregatan 12E, Göteborg
Date of defence
2015-10-16
jan.derks@odontologi.gu.se
Date
2015-09-10Author
Derks, Jan
Keywords
dental implants
patient outcome assessment
implant loss
peri-implantitis
prevalence
risk factor
Publication type
Doctoral thesis
ISBN
978-91-628-9492-4 (PDF)
978-91-628-9491-7 (Print)
Language
eng