Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhang, Nan
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-06T10:40:33Z
dc.date.available2016-07-06T10:40:33Z
dc.date.issued2016-03
dc.identifier.issn1653-8919
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/45034
dc.description.abstractDoes democracy reduce corruption? While much recent research has focused on the ability of citizens in democracies to hold politicians accountable through regular elections, other institutional features of democracy such as a free press and independent civil society may also strengthen accountability by lowering the costs of monitoring and sanctioning malfeasance. Using an original dataset of high-profile corruption cases across 154 countries, I find a strong positive relationship between democratic institutions and anti-corruption enforcement. Moreover, this relationship obtains after restricting attention to states without free and fair elections, suggesting that even in countries where citizens cannot reliably exercise accountability through the ballot, liberalization of the civic sphere can help hold malfeasance in check.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Paperssv
dc.relation.ispartofseries2016:5sv
dc.relation.urihttp://qog.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1567/1567568_2016_5_zhang.pdfsv
dc.titleDemocratic advantages in corruption control. New Evidence from Anti-Corruption Cases across 154 Countriessv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.sveparticle, other scientificsv
dc.contributor.organizationQoG Institutesv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record