Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSuzuki, Kohei
dc.contributor.editorAvellaneda, Claudioa N.
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-15T10:25:12Z
dc.date.available2016-09-15T10:25:12Z
dc.date.issued2016-09
dc.identifier.issn1653-8919
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/47102
dc.description.abstractA profound structural change is municipal merger. This come about through absorption of small units or merge of units to create a new entity. Both are intended to improve efficiency by taking advantage of economies of scale and scope. However, consolidation may temporarily and negative-ly affect other dimensions of performance. Nevertheless, experienced chief executives should miti-gate the transitional challenges. This study tests the moderating effect of chief executive’s public experience on the consolidation-performance relationship. This proposition is tested using data for all the 807 city-level Japanese municipalities for the 2006-2010 period. Two dimensions of perfor-mance are studied: efficiency in operational costs, and effectiveness in revenue collection. Findings reveal that merger through municipal absorption increases efficiency in operational costs but reduc-es revenue expansion. Merger through creation of a new municipality reduces municipal own reve-nue collection. Chief executive’s past experience neither mitigate nor accelerate the effects of mu-nicipal consolidation on performance.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Paperssv
dc.relation.ispartofseries2016:11sv
dc.relation.urihttp://qog.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1587/1587000_2016_11_suzuki_avellandela.pdfsv
dc.titleDoes Chief Executive’s Experience Moderate Consolidation’s Impact on Municipal Performancesv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.type.sveparticle, other scientificsv
dc.contributor.organizationQoG Institutesv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record