dc.contributor.author | Allzén, Simon | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-09T09:42:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-02-09T09:42:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-02-09 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/51582 | |
dc.description.abstract | ABSTRACT. The Eleatic Principle denies the existence of causally inert entities. In this paper, I discuss a particular justification of the principle - that causally inert entities have no explanatory value in science. I argue against this justification, showing that non-causal explanations and entities do important work in scientific explanations. I then propose that the Eleatic should instead
adopt an alternative principle, one where explanatory power conditions the existence of postulated entities. To flesh out the principle, I present an account of explanation, connecting it with directed dependency, arguing that grounding
dependence, not just causal dependence, can generate explanation. Finally, I point to a theory that could minimize the ontological commitments entailed by accepting the new principle. | sv |
dc.language.iso | eng | sv |
dc.subject | eleaticism | sv |
dc.title | New Eleaticism | sv |
dc.title.alternative | New Eleaticism | sv |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.setspec.uppsok | HumanitiesTheology | |
dc.type.uppsok | H1 | |
dc.contributor.department | Göteborgs universitet/Institutionen för filosofi, lingvistik och vetenskapsteori | swe |
dc.contributor.department | Göteborg University/Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science | eng |
dc.type.degree | Student essay | |